Who has the right to sue President Trump?
Summary
Georgetown Law professor Stephen Vladek analyzes recent Supreme Court rulings on standing, contrasting the temporary procedural bar in the mail-in ballot case with the permanent dismissal of the White House ballroom lawsuit. He argues that the Court’s inconsistent application of standing doctrine, which appears stricter against Republican presidents, effectively enables executive overreach by blocking judicial checks. Vladek highlights that Congress’s failure to assert its own authority has forced citizens to rely on courts, creating a constitutional crisis. He suggests that if Democrats re…
Topics discussed
Sponsor message and show introduction
Overview of recent Supreme Court rulings on executive power
Analysis of standing in the mail-in ballot case
Permanent standing ruling in the White House ballroom case
Inconsistency in standing doctrine and the role of Congress
Should the Supreme Court adjust standing rules for political reality?
Discussion on potential partisan bias in the Court's decisions
Future litigation scenarios if Democrats retake Congress
Guest sign-off and NPR Plus sponsorship promotion
Show outro and transition to other NPR content
Promotions for The Sunday Story and Planet Money podcasts
Listen ad-free on Castria