Why Susan Collins Has Lasted So Long
Summary
Emma Green discusses her New Yorker feature on Maine Senator Susan Collins, analyzing her strategy of using seniority to secure over $1.5 billion in local projects while maintaining a moderate, bipartisan reputation. The episode contrasts Collins’ "relentlessly local" approach with challenger Troy Jackson’s national progressive platform, examining whether voters prioritize tangible state benefits or systemic change. Green also covers the impact of ProPublica’s report on alleged corruption and the FBI’s role, as well as Collins’ complex, often adversarial relationship with President Trump.
Topics discussed
Introduction and first impressions of Susan Collins
Maine's political landscape and the Democratic challenger
Background of challenger Troy Jackson
Local vs. national political priorities
The meaning of independence in Maine politics
ProPublica report on FBI inquiry and corruption allegations
Collins' response and Jackson's campaign strategy
Sponsor reads for GQ and Bon Appétit
Collins' reputation as an independent bridge builder
Power of the Appropriations Committee chairmanship
How congressional earmarks and discretionary spending work
Collins' track record of securing funds for Maine
The complex relationship between Collins and Trump
Voter perceptions of Collins' voting record
The tension between local benefits and party loyalty
Sponsor reads for GQ, Bon Appétit, and In the Dark
Expressive vs. instrumental voting in Senate races
Visceral reactions to specific policy wins like tariffs
Visibility of infrastructure projects and voter awareness
Defining Collins' moderation and bipartisanship
Conclusion and the future of moderate Republicanism
Sponsor read for Vanity Fair
Sponsor reads for Bon Appétit and In the Dark
Listen ad-free on Castria