BREAKING: Supreme Court Blocks Trump Mail-In Ballot Scheme
Summary
The MeidasTouch Podcast reports that the Supreme Court blocked Trump’s postal service rule, which would have allowed the federal government to disqualify mail ballots not matching a specific voter list. The 7-2 decision, with Justice Kavanaugh concurring on timing grounds, preserves state control over elections ahead of the 2026 midterms. Hosts analyze the dissent by Justices Alito and Thomas, who argued the postal service had statutory authority, and note that even without Kavanaugh, a 6-3 majority remains to block similar schemes in 2028.
Topics discussed
Sponsors: Akamai Cloud and Fidelity Trader Plus
Sponsors: Mint Mobile and Anthropic
Sponsor: Toyota Truck Savings Event
Breaking News: Supreme Court blocks Trump ballot scheme
Context: District court judges and signal to SCOTUS
Vote breakdown: 7-2 decision and future implications
Analysis of the Court's order and Kavanaugh's concurrence
Dissenting justices and concerns for 2028 elections
Procedural background: Standing and justiciability issues
Debate on injury: Threats vs. implementation of rules
Dissent argument: Standing and Election Clause interpretation
Postal Service immunity and Administrative Procedure Act
Ultra vires doctrine and state rights protection
The 'Hail Mary' pass: Limits of ultra vires claims
Conclusion: Good news for midterms and voter power
Outro: Book promotion and subscription call
Listen ad-free on Castria