BREAKING: Supreme Court Blocks Trump Mail-In Ballot Scheme
Summary
The MeidasTouch Podcast reports that the U.S. Supreme Court blocked Donald Trump’s scheme to impose a new Postal Service rule that would have allowed the federal government to disqualify state mail-in ballots. The 7-2 decision, which included a concurrence from Justice Kavanaugh, ruled that applying the rule before the 2026 midterms was arbitrary and capricious. The hosts analyze the dissent by Justices Alito and Thomas, who argued the Postal Service had statutory authority, and highlight how this ruling preserves state control over elections.
Topics discussed
Breaking news: Supreme Court blocks Trump's ballot scheme
District court rulings and signals to the Supreme Court
7-2 decision breakdown and Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence
Reading the Supreme Court order and procedural history
Kavanaugh's rationale: timing and administrative law
Future implications for 2028 and concerns over dissent
Procedural background: from injunctions to emergency petition
Dissent arguments on standing and the Election Clause
Postal Service statutory authority and APA exemptions
Explaining the 'ultra vires' and immunity arguments
District court views and the Missouri state rights parallel
The 'Hail Mary pass' standard for ultra vires claims
Deconstructing the dissent's logic on mail vs. elections
Summary: Good news for midterms and election integrity
Outro and book promotion
Listen ad-free on Castria