A journalist's trick for talking to people you can't stand | Joshua Johnson
Summary
Journalist Joshua Johnson argues that moving closer to people with opposing views fosters understanding better than maintaining neutral distance. He distinguishes between neutrality, which hides opinions, and objectivity, which involves studying beliefs like a scientist examines samples. By asking short questions and seeking personal stories, we can uncover the human reasons behind controversial stances. This approach helps bridge political divides and transform difficult conversations into meaningful connections.
Topics discussed
Intro: Moving closer to people you disagree with
Sponsors: Defender, Apple Card, and Dell
The failure of neutrality in a Confederate interview
Objectivity vs. Neutrality: The microscope metaphor
Parking opinions to learn without judgment
Connecting with a traumatized police officer
Three tips for better conversations
Outro and production credits
Sponsors: Kohler, Capital One, and Choiceology
Listen ad-free on Castria