Trump’s Push to Reshape the 2026 Election (with Kate Shaw)
Summary
Constitutional law professor Kate Shaw joins Joyce Vance to analyze the Trump administration’s executive order targeting mail-in voting. They discuss the Solicitor General’s repeated emergency appeals to the Supreme Court, which Shaw argues are procedurally improper and designed to bypass the appellate process. The conversation covers District Judge Talani’s preliminary injunction, which found the order unconstitutional and a violation of multiple statutes. Shaw explains that while the legal merits are clear, the Supreme Court’s unpredictable stance on the right to vote makes the outcome un…
Topics discussed
Introduction to Kate Shaw and episode topics
Sponsorship and subscription promotion
Context on the shadow docket and mail voting
Procedural status: District court vs Supreme Court
The Solicitor General's claim of emergency
Predicting the Supreme Court's response
Uncertainty in current Supreme Court rulings
First trip to SCOTUS: Ripeness and standing
Second trip: Merits and constitutional violations
Plaintiffs and Judge Talani's preliminary injunction
Assessing the legal reasoning and SG's arguments
Impact on voters and partisan implications
Balancing equities and irreparable harm
The right to vote vs. government interests
Closing remarks and subscription call to action
Sponsor: Vanta third-party risk management
Sponsor: Deepgram Flux TTS
Listen ad-free on Castria