Trump’s Election Interference Playbook (with Vanita Gupta)
Summary
Civil rights attorney Vanita Gupta joins Preet Bharara and Joyce Vance to analyze the Trump administration’s legal challenges to the 2024 midterm elections, specifically focusing on the "Dan Sullivan" ballot controversy in Alaska and related litigation in California. Gupta argues that the Justice Department’s lawsuits are legally meritless and represent a radical departure from historical norms, serving instead as a tool for political intimidation and the weaponization of federal power.
Topics discussed
Introduction and guest Vanita Gupta
Overview of election threats and Alaska situation
Discussion on ballot stacking and dirty politics
Analysis of the DOJ lawsuit in Alaska
Hypocrisy of DOJ actions and Washington state comparison
Legal merits and state sovereignty in Alaska case
Internal DOJ dynamics and timing of intervention
Criminal investigations and grand jury subpoenas
Potential outcomes if Democrat wins in Alaska
Voter privacy and impossibility of post-election audit
DOJ's intended role vs current political interference
Preparation by election officials for federal interference
DOJ track record of losses in election challenges
Role of DHS and ICE in election enforcement
State responsibilities for voter list maintenance
Supreme Court appeals and final outlook
Listen ad-free on Castria