Lindsay Clancy killed her children. Here's why so many women still support her.
Summary
Hosts Carter Sherman and Kai Wright interview The Guardian’s Jenna Amatuli about the Lindsay Clancy trial, where a mother is accused of killing her three children. They discuss how the case highlights failures in US maternal mental health care, particularly regarding postpartum psychosis. The conversation also examines the intense public empathy for Clancy, contrasting it with the lack of attention given to similar cases involving women of color, and critiques the rise of online "forensic fandom."
Topics discussed
Introduction: The Lindsay Clancy case and maternal health crisis
Case details: Lindsay Clancy's tragedy and trial overview
Interview start: Why the Lindsay Clancy case captivates the public
Lindsay Clancy's background and the prosecution's case
Defense argument: Postpartum psychosis and lack of criminal intent
Medical failures: Doctor shopping and fragmented care in Massachusetts
Insanity defense and the stigma surrounding maternal mental health
Systemic issues: Lack of screening and resources for postpartum care
Sponsors: Wayfair, Aerie, and Walden University
Public reaction: Empathy for Lindsay and suspicion of Patrick Clancy
Racial disparity: Comparing Lindsay Clancy to Latartha Sanders
Intrusive thoughts and the 'missing white woman' syndrome
Shifting public opinion and the impact of live court broadcasts
Forensic fandom: Conspiracy theories and true crime culture
Conclusion: The failure of the 'village' and call for better care
Outro: Mental health resources and production credits
Listen ad-free on Castria