How the Cornell 7 Case Exposed the Media
Oct 8, 2026 · 1h 19m
Summary
The hosts discuss the media's disproportionate focus on the Cornell University gang rape allegations, arguing it serves a political agenda rather than genuine news. They critique the New York Times for sensationalizing the story and ignoring contradictory evidence, such as the accuser’s initial claims of consent. The episode highlights the involvement of Attorney General Letitia James and AOC, viewing their actions as attempts to weaponize the case for political gain. The discussion concludes by questioning whether true justice is possible in America given the media’s ideological bias and t…
Topics discussed
Intro and political ads
Show intro and news disconnect
Cornell case background and media coverage
Legal details and accuser's timeline
Attorney strategy and media firestorm
Political intervention by Letitia James
Analysis of accuser's initial statements
The 'aha moment' and Halloween disinvite
Media activism and AOC's narrative
Broader cultural and political implications
Question of the day: Justice in America
Maine Senate debate preview
Susan Collins vs Troy Jackson debate clips
King of the Hill: Steve Schmidt vs Kinzinger
Michigan Senate race and Peter Welch
Listener comments and outro
Listen ad-free on Castria