A Gen Z Reporter Questions Jonathan Haidt, author of ‘The Anxious Generation’
Summary
Host Brian Reed shares a special interview between Ava Smithing and psychologist Jonathan Haidt, discussing recent jury verdicts against Meta and YouTube for harming children. Haidt argues for banning social media for under-16s to protect developing brains, while Smithing critiques this approach, advocating for broader "safety by design" legislation that addresses addictive algorithms for all ages. The dialogue explores the tension between age restrictions and systemic platform reform.
Topics discussed
Introduction and support for Question Everything
Meta trial verdicts and Ava's interview with Jonathan Haidt
Legal victories against Meta and global social media bans
Haidt's shift from political psychology to social media research
The end of unsupervised play and correlation vs causation
Attention fragmentation and Meta's knowledge of addiction
Internal documents, incentives, and addressing Gen Z anxiety
The case for banning social media for under-16s
Design legislation and the impossibility of safe platforms for kids
Online savagery, community, and Gen Z's desire to quit
Business models, philanthropy, and alternative platforms
Know your customer laws and free speech vs design choices
Student success stories and Australia's ban enforcement
Opportunity costs, forbidden fruit, and Gen Z opposition
Gambling, porn, and the case for dumb phones
Equity issues, structural inequality, and conclusion
Listen ad-free on Castria