Bonus: Standing Aside, Loudly
Summary
Gavin Newsom’s statement that he will not run for president in 2028 if Kamala Harris does is analyzed as a tactical move to manage shared donor bases and avoid a messy primary. The hosts critique Newsom’s political record, noting he has never faced a competitive race and recently vetoed key AI safety legislation. They also debate Harris’s viability, acknowledging her strong debate performance while arguing that her previous losses and lack of public appetite make a second run unlikely.
Topics discussed
Newsom's conditional pledge to Tapper
The 'running gear' metaphor and fly fishing tableau
Strategic signaling of a 'natural habitat' candidate
Donor overlap and the tactical problem with Harris
Critique of Newsom as an 'uber progressive'
Newsom's lack of competitive race experience
Newsom's veto of AI transparency and safety bills
Contradiction in calling Harris a 'weak candidate'
Lack of party appetite for Newsom or Harris
Defense of Harris's 2024 campaign performance
Historical precedent for repeat presidential candidates
Listen ad-free on Castria