What Would It Take to Eliminate Poverty? | The Professor Is In
Summary
Justin Wolfers and Augusta discuss how poverty is measured in the US, contrasting the outdated official line with the modern supplemental measure that accounts for regional cost-of-living differences. They explore the subjective nature of "getting by" and why Americans often perceive poverty thresholds as much higher than official statistics. The episode also examines the trade-offs of redistribution and argues that Universal Basic Income could become essential if AI automation displaces human labor, framing it as compensation for the collective knowledge used to build these technologies.
Topics discussed
Sponsor: MaintainX for maintenance management
Sponsor: Alma for therapist billing
Introduction: Poverty in America and episode setup
Defining the official poverty line for households
History of the poverty measure and Molly Oshansky
The Supplemental Poverty Measure and cost of living
How the poverty threshold is calculated
The subjective nature of defining poverty
Essential goods: FUCSUTI to FUCSOTI
Adjusting for inflation and changing spending habits
Geographic differences in cost of living
Regional price parity and state-by-state data
Asking the public: What does it take to get by?
Gallup survey results on income needed to get by
Global context: American poverty vs. world poverty
Development economics and charitable giving priorities
Sponsor: Culligan Purity water cooler
Sponsor: T-Mobile 5G network
Why not just fix poverty? The economist's answer
Efficiency vs. Equity trade-offs in redistribution
Universal Basic Income: Concept and political barriers
UBI in the age of AI and knowledge ownership
Conclusion and call to action
Sponsor: NerdWallet Smart Money Podcast
Sponsor: RingCentral AI Receptionist
Listen ad-free on Castria