The USPS Ballot Scheme Was Even Worse Than You Thought
Summary
Hosts Thomas and Janessa discuss the Supreme Court’s decision allowing mail-in ballots to proceed, analyzing the ruling’s implications and the Court’s internal dynamics. They examine whistleblower reports exposing incompetence in the Postal Service’s ballot verification system and a DHS initiative to identify "illegal" voters. The episode also covers the chaotic mid-decade redistricting battle in Missouri, where courts invalidated a new map after primaries were already held.
Topics discussed
Sponsor: Gametime app for buying tickets
Host intro and show reset
Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots
Relief and election preparation efforts
Reaction to Alito's dissent
Whistleblower reports and election security
Sponsor: FICO scores
Analyzing the 6-3 vote and dissents
Speculating on the 5th vote and concurrence
Worst-case scenarios and court composition
Major question doctrine and postal authority
Whistleblower report: System design flaws
Zero failure rate and batch rejection issues
Incompetence vs. malice in system failure
Sponsor: Grow therapy
Injunctions and state participation limits
Advice to vote in person vs. mail
Second whistleblower and government acronyms
Voter roll databases and identity verification
Flaws in voter verification training
Encouraging voter participation
Missouri redistricting and mid-decade maps
Missouri referendum and primary election chaos
Federal court intervention in Missouri map
Supreme Court stays and deadline pressures
Legal arguments on equal protection
Contempt hearing and final injunction
Conclusion and show credits
Sponsor: Smart Money Insurance
Listen ad-free on Castria