Did Karmelo Anthony Receive a Fair Trial? An Attorney Breaks Down the Evidentiary Hearing
Summary
Host Steph interviews attorney MD to analyze the evidentiary hearing for Carmelo Anthony’s appeal. They discuss the high burden of proof for a new trial, focusing on the defense’s claim of a breached informal "gentleman’s agreement" and potential violations of the Waller test regarding public trial rights. MD concludes that while the appeal faces steep odds, Anthony likely did not receive a fair trial due to venue issues and jury selection in Collin County.
Topics discussed
Introduction and overview of Carmelo Anthony evidentiary hearing
Burden of proof for granting a new trial
Definition and nature of a 'gentleman's agreement'
Defense reliance on the informal agreement and resulting prejudice
Difficulty of proving reliance without written record
Critique of defense strategy and informal attorney relationships
Constitutional rights: Due process and right to testify
The Waller test for closing trials to the public
Evidence admissibility, discovery, and motions in limine
Appellate standards for reversing verdicts
Fair trial concerns, jury selection, and closing remarks
Listen ad-free on Castria