Trump's Control of DOJ: Exhibits A B and C
Summary
Andrew Weisman and Mary McCord analyze Todd Blanche’s confirmation efforts, criticizing his superficial attempts to appease senators regarding the anti-weaponization fund. They detail new motions in James Comey’s case, arguing the prosecution is vindictive and lacks legal merit as a "true threat." Finally, they discuss the dismissal of Reflecting Pool vandalism charges, highlighting prosecutorial failures and withheld evidence that undermined the government's case.
Topics discussed
Sponsor: Energy Transfer
Sponsor: Ozempic
Introduction and episode overview
Todd Blanche confirmation and Anti-Weaponization Fund
Rescinding the Fund and the Settlement Agreement
Senate approval and the 'fig leaf' of the order
Congressional inaction and Epstein victims meeting
Tax immunity order and its limitations
Political implications for Senate Republicans
Sponsors: Grüns and Designer Shoe Warehouse
Comey case: Vindictive prosecution and true threat motions
Secret Service and FBI surveillance of the Comeys
Grand jury issues and the '8647' code investigation
Mob expert testimony and the '86' meaning
White House micromanagement and public reaction
First Amendment arguments and true threat standard
Sponsor: Grüns and CertiPur
Reflecting Pool case: Evidence and grand jury failure
Janine Pirro's defense and Department of Interior blame
Botched construction and dismissal of charges
Defamation lawsuit and presidential immunity claims
Outro and Sponsor: Zepbound
Listen ad-free on Castria