Will the Feds Be a Nuisance or a Menace at the Polls in November? — John McCormack
Summary
This episode examines a confrontation in Wyoming where federal DOJ observers allegedly intimidated poll workers and demanded access to voting machines during a primary, prompting Governor Mark Gordon to criticize the federal intrusion. The piece contrasts local officials' successful resistance with the DOJ's claim of routine monitoring, while experts debate whether this signals broader federal interference in the 2026 midterms. It also analyzes the low likelihood of the FBI seizing uncounted ballots due to logistical and legal constraints, noting that while Congress retains authority over e…
Topics discussed
Introduction and article overview
DOJ observers confront poll workers in Wyoming
County clerk details DOJ demands and lack of credentials
Governor Gordon criticizes federal interference
DOJ Assistant AG defends routine monitoring
Clerk disputes DOJ account of equipment inquiries
Context: Wyoming as a Trump stronghold
Expert analysis on unusual nature of incident
Speculation on DOJ motives and training issues
Background on contested House race and Chuck Gray
DOJ notification process and local response
Former AZ official compares incident to past norms
Concerns about Trump's obsession with 2020 election
Review of 2020 ballot seizures and failed investigations
History of calls to seize voting machines
Risks of seizing uncounted ballots
Logistical constraints on federal seizure of ballots
Legal barriers to FBI hot pursuit claims
Congressional authority to refuse seating members
Senate vs House dynamics in certifying elections
Role of US Clerk and dueling certificates
Historical precedent for certification disputes
Conclusion and final risk assessment
Listen ad-free on Castria