Ancient Crimes in Modern Times: The 346th Evolutionary Lens with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying
Oct 7, 2026 · 2h 13m
Summary
The hosts analyze the "Cornell 7" sexual assault allegations, arguing that the civil suit’s claims of institutional liability and lack of consent contradict the plaintiff’s original police statement and her active participation in the events. They critique the legal strategy of naming deep-pocketed institutions like Cornell and local bars as defendants, suggesting the case reflects a dangerous "care, custody, and control" narrative that strips women of personal agency. The discussion also touches on the third anniversary of October 7th and a plague outbreak, framing both as major disruptors…
Topics discussed
Welcome and introduction to the live stream
Overview of the Cornell case and changing narratives
Book giveaway and sponsorships
Sponsor segments: Sauna Space and insurance
Sponsor segment: Caraway Kitchenware
Case background and initial public perception
Debate on default beliefs and institutional due diligence
Defendants named in the civil suit
Legal strategy and financial incentives in the lawsuit
Plaintiff's background and university experience
Analysis of consent and the 'care, custody, and control' claim
Discrepancies between original and current statements
Critique of liability claims against Mooney's Bar
Evidence review: Individual defendants and Cornell findings
DA's refusal to file charges and police reports
Media coverage and post-event interactions
Cultural critique: Broken norms and personal responsibility
Comparing the harm of rape to other crimes
Biological perspectives on sex and risk management
Critique of Cornell's sex education materials
The inadequacy of consent culture and privacy
Conclusion on the case and the Me Too movement
Discussion on safety, protectionism, and risk
News: Plague outbreak in Russia and researcher death
Analysis of potential bioweapon or PSYOP scenarios
Closing remarks and book availability
Listen ad-free on Castria