Amicus Plus Amicus Plus

Bonus: The Judges That Keep Fighting Back

Sep 19, 2026 · 30m

Summary

Hosts discuss the Trump administration’s defiance of a court order to remove his name from the Kennedy Center, framing it as emblematic of broader rule-of-law decay. They analyze a New York Times interview with judges who spoke out about the dangers of the ICE surge in Minneapolis, highlighting the unprecedented nature of sitting judges breaking professional norms due to fear. The episode also covers a federal judge’s ruling against the administration’s new visa caps for international students, which was deemed arbitrary and capricious.

Topics discussed

Welcome, punch card promo, and guest introduction Kennedy Center: Timeline of the name change dispute Symbolism of megalomania and destruction of institutions Defiance of court orders and judicial tools for enforcement Legal norms, the risk of irreversible damage, and Judge Cooper NYT interview with judges: Why sitting judges are speaking out Critique of the interviewed judge's conservative bona fides Judicial safety, threats, and the cost of upholding due process Personal burden on judges and the reality of mass deportations New visa restrictions on international students and scholars Legal analysis: Arbitrary and capricious rulemaking Xenophobia, chilling effects, and piercing administrative pretexts Closing remarks, credits, and listener engagement
Listen ad-free on Castria