Receipts on the Senate Filibuster | Interview: Mike “Frags” Fragoso
Jul 30, 2026 · 1h 8m
Summary
Sarah Isger and David French discuss the Supreme Court’s pending review of a Trump executive order on mail-in voting, clarifying that the case centers on standing rather than the order’s legality. They then interview Mike Fragoso, former chief counsel to Mitch McConnell, about how the elimination of the judicial filibuster has shifted federal judge profiles toward younger, highly credentialed nominees. The conversation contrasts these modern picks with the older, politically savvy judges confirmed during the filibuster era, debating the trade-offs between academic excellence and broader lif…
Topics discussed
Supreme Court appeal on mail-in voting executive order and standing
Legal analysis of mutual combat and self-defense in a duel case
Introduction of Mike Fragoso and the filibuster debate
History of the judicial filibuster and its abolition
Comparing credentials of pre- and post-filibuster judges
The Federalist Society's influence on judicial selection
Career paths in the judiciary versus other branches
The Congressional Review Act and legislative oversight
The future of the legislative filibuster and Senate norms
Conclusion and final thoughts on judicial nominations
Listen ad-free on Castria