West Virginia v. B.P.J.
Summary
Hosts Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael analyze *West Virginia v. BPJ*, where the Supreme Court upheld a ban on trans girls in school sports. They critique the 6-3 majority for ignoring the specific facts of the case, which involved one 12-year-old runner, and for relying on biological essentialism. The episode highlights Justice Thomas’s transphobic concurrence and Justices Sotomayor and Jackson’s dissents, which argue the ruling violates equal protection and misinterprets Title IX.
Topics discussed
Intro: Lindsey Graham's health scare and podcast banter
Background on trans sports bans and West Virginia v. BPJ
BPJ's story and the 'zero-sum' sports argument
Kavanaugh's majority opinion and biological advantage claims
Title IX, Bostock precedent and Gorsuch's concurrence
Justice Thomas's concurrence on gender binary
Sotomayor's concurrence and equal protection analysis
Jackson's concurrence on sex discrimination and stereotypes
The real harm to trans youth and the value of sports
Wedge issues, political strategy, and episode wrap-up
Listen ad-free on Castria